Why has NeoBux has changed its rate (not good for its users)

There is a lot of confusion with the members of arguably the best Paid To Click (PTC) site on the planet NeoBux. Confusion started today (March 13th, 2011) when NeoBux announced a major change in their click rates for their users. What are the new click rates? Who will be benefited? Read on.

Earlier NeoBux paid 1 cent (0.01USD) per advertisement and now they will pay 0.1 cent (0.001 USD). Which means they will have to work 10 times harder to get the same amount. For standard members now they will not earn 4 cents per day, instead it will take them 3 days to cross 1 cent. Also, they have not changed the Golden Pack rates nor they have changed the rented referral rates which has caused a rage with its members.


After viewing its forum, I found almost all types of members (golden and standard) more then willing to quit. You cannot blame them. Earning the minimum payout of 2USD would take months if not a year.

I was a happy member of Neobux until today. Being a Golden member I earned around 1USD a day. Now I will be lucky if I touch 25cents.

Golden members will have more trouble, post the declaration most of the standard members will quit. Which will affect the Golden members big time as their income solely depended on the referrals.

Though the new rates will be great for the advertisement, but on the long run, it will impact advertisements too. Because there has already been a drastic drop in the membership. Thousands have already quit and millions are just waiting, hoping that the Admin will change the rates back to the original.

Its a wait and watch game for the users who work from home and earned few hundred dollars with such online business opportunities.

Till then I will try few other popular PTCs like OnBux, EasyHits4u, DonkeyMails and No-Minimum.

I just hope other PTC / Paid to Signups / CPA websites should not follow NeoBux's trend.

A suggestion/feedback will be appreciated. Thanks for visiting.

Salman Khan extends support to blood donation camp on Independence Day

Bollywood actor Salman Khan has pledged his support to Go India Foundation’s initiative of organising a blood donation camp in Pune on August 15. The foundation aims to collect 63,000 bottles of blood on the 63rd Independence Day.

According to a press note issued by the foundation, members of the Pune chapter of the organisation had met Salman at his Mumbai residence last Sunday and sought help for the cause. The actor not only agreed to lend a helping hand by endorsing the campaign, but also launched the donor T-shirts.

President of Go India Foundation’s Maharashtra chapter Mayuresh Phatak, Maharashtra Secretary Sarang Patharkar and Vikram Patil, president of the Pune chapter Jayraj Landage along with the chairperson of the organisation from Delhi Alka Lamba had met Salman.

“A nationwide blood donation drive will be held on August 15 over 250 districts. Our target is to provide India 100% safe voluntary blood, so that the need of replacement donation never arises,” said Lamba.

In Pune, blood donation camps will be held at SP College, Mahatma Phule Museum on Ghole Road, Bharati Vidyapeeth, MIT College at Kothrud and Azam Campus.


Source: IndianExpress

How to play with words - by Keith Sands

This paragraph is not ordinary. Look at it. At first, it won’t look too odd. Just a normal paragraph – you may think. But look at it again and you might find it a bit unusual. Just a tiny bit. What’s wrong with it, you may ask? Nothing wrong at all, in fact, as I said, it’s just slightly unusual. It’s difficult to put it in words. Look again. Is anything not right? Can you spot it? Is anything . . . missing?

What you’ve just read is a lipogram – a text written without using a particular letter of the alphabet. It's the hardest kind of lipogram, as it doesn’t contain the letter E – the most common letter in the English language. Try writing one yourself, even a few sentences, and you’ll see it's pretty difficult. Now imagine the task faced by the French writer Georges Perec, when a friend challenged him to write a whole novel without using E – a letter that is even more common in French than in English.

Perec was a frighteningly clever writer. He was a lover of word games and puzzles, and a master of the Chinese board game Go. He wrote crossword puzzles for Paris magazines. He had already written a 5,000 word palindrome – a text that reads the same forwards and back, like the well known ‘A man, a plan, a canal – Panama’. But his friends thought that this task would be beyond him. Indeed, they staked money on it.

Unlocking the imagination
He took up the challenge. He was unable to use more than 70 per cent of the words in the French language. The most common articles and pronouns, most of the French verb endings, and nearly every feminine noun were off-limits. Imagine a French writer not being able to use ‘une’, ‘le’, ‘je’, ‘elle’, ‘est’, or ‘et’. Surely enough to kill any writer’s ability to create.

But Perec was not just any writer. He discovered that, on the contrary, this ‘impossible’ rule unlocked his imagination. He later claimed that he wrote his novel faster than any of his other books. He was forced to think. He had to fight for every sentence. He had no choice but to be original.

The result was La Disparition, a surreal detective story about the mysterious disappearance of a character named A. Vowl. (Get it?) The only Es were the four in his name on the cover. He placed dozens of clues in the book about the fantastically difficult rule he was working under. (For example, the chapters are numbered one to 26, but there is no chapter five, E being the fifth letter of the alphabet.) Despite the clues, many of the original reviewers failed to spot what was staring them in their faces – the missing letter. Embarassing for the critics; hilarious for the writer and his friends.

Fortunately, the game Perec was playing did not destroy the book itself. It’s not just a novel without the letter E, it’s a good novel in its own right – very funny, if you know its secret; and rather disturbing if you don’t. Every sentence seems twisted slightly out of shape, and the resulting style is unique. It’s like chaos theory, which says that a butterfly’s wingbeat in South America might cause a hurricane in China. Remove a tiny thing – a single letter, that you’d hardly notice – and the whole world is changed.

After he finished his novel, Perec decided he needed to use up all the Es he hadn’t used in the novel, so he got rid of the As, Is, Os, and Us – and wrote a short story in which E is the only vowel.

Has anyone matched Perec? Probably only the British writer Gilbert Adair, who translated La Disparition into English. Again without using a single E. You could argue this is even more difficult than Perec’s original task, as Adair had to keep to the original story. Nevertheless, he managed it. Even the title was hard to translate: it couldn’t be called The Disappearance. The title of the English version is A Void, a play on words Perec himself would have enjoyed. ‘Avoid’, of course, is what the writer does when he writes a lipogram – avoiding all those nasty words with E in them.

Instant poetry
Perec was given his ‘impossible’ task by a fellow member of OuLiPo (Ouvroir de littérature potentielle – the Workshop of Potential Literature). This was a group of experimental writers in Paris in the 1960s, whose leading figures were Perec, Raymond Queneau, and the Italian Italo Calvino. The OuLiPo group developed the theory that writing under constraints and rules was a way to achieve true originality. Perec liked the paradox – the more you limit yourself, the freer you have to become.

Perec’s book is proof, perhaps, that this experiment works. But probably only if you’re brilliant in the first place. However, another of the OuLiPo word games is within everyone’s reach. Anyone can write an OuLiPo poem – all you need is a pen, paper and a dictionary.

Take a poem you like, or maybe one you don’t like, and underline all the nouns.

Look them up in the dictionary, count seven entries forward from the noun you started with and replace the word in the poem with the word you find. If it’s a verb, add ‘-ing’. So here are the first lines of Dante’s ‘Inferno’:

In the middle of the journey of my life
I found myself in a dark wood . . .

Which becomes:

In the midnight of the joy of my life insurance
I found mythology in a dark woodpile . . .

You now have an OuLiPo poem. It won’t make much sense, but it’ll probably have some surprising phrases in it you wouldn’t otherwise have thought of. If you don’t like it, change the adjectives as well. Then the verbs. It’s cheating, but it’s truly democratic. Anyone can be a poet – sort of. And it’s a lot easier than lipograms.

Vocabulary
Five words/phrases from the text:

•  odd: peculiar or strange
•  challenge: to invite somebody to engage in a contest
•  stake: to risk something (such as money) on the result of a game
•  critic: a person who evaluates creative work
•  paradox: a statement that seems self contradictory

Exercise one
Vocabulary gap fill. Now use the five words/phrases to fill the gaps in the sentences below:

1. Most of the reviews were good but one ………[1] said that his book was complicated and difficult to read.
2. He decided to ………[2] his brother to a game of chess.
3. He wanted to ………[3] all of his money on the game because he was sure he could win.
4. She couldn’t live with him but she couldn’t live without him either; the situation was a ………[4]
5. The main character of the film was an ………[5] little boy who was able to fly but unable to talk.

Exercise two
Comprehension: true or false. Decide whether these sentences are TRUE or FALSE according to the text:

1. Perec’s friends knew he could write a novel without using E.
2. Perec could use only fewer than half the words in the French language.
3. Perec found the experience made him more creative.
4. The critics were told in advance about Perec’s difficult rule’.
5. If you don’t notice the missing Es, the novel does not seem strange.

Answers
Vocabulary

1. critic
2. challenge
3. stake
4. paradox
5. odd

Comprehension

1. False
2. True
3. True
4. False
5. False

Source: Britishcouncil.org